Comparing Housman's and Updike's poems that have two totally different attitudes toward athletes.

In A.E. Housmans poesy To an Athletes Dying Young and derriere Updikes poem Ex- hoops Player, each of the speakers use two different types of attitudes toward the athletes. In A.E. Housmans poem, his sort of thinking about the athlete is negative. Smart lad, to brake shoe betimes away From field where glory does non stay And proto(prenominal) though the laurel grows It shrivel quicker than the rose. (955) The author expresses that the expiration of this young athlete fleck he was famous was demote than growing old and go through losing it. So set, in front its echoes fade, The fleet foot on the sill of shade, And aim to the low header up The still- defended challenge-cup.(955) To die famous is better than dying(p) a null which many athletes end up doing. On the early(a) hand John Updikes state of mind toward athletes is sad. He was good: in fact, the best. In 46 He bucketed three hundred ninety points,A county record still. The be loved interchange. (1) The author sh ows that ikon was so great at one point in his life, so good that Flick neer though of learning new skills because he would non need them to play basketball.

He never learned a trade, he just sells gas, Checks oil, and changes flats. Once in a while, As a gag, he dribbles an inner tube, But most of us remember anyway.(1) Now Flicks life is energy more than eonian job of doing crap. Basketball was not a career that never ended because it does end once somebody better or young comes along to take a place of an senior player. The author revels the haunting truth that you faecal matter not be the best forever. If you w! ant to get a abounding essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper