12 Angry Men: Emotion Essay

Emotions have significant role in the film 12 Angry Men when the jurors have to come to a decision closely whether the boy is guilty or not. The disparate emotions shown by the jurors hinderstheir perspective and judgements on the case as well as towards the testimonies from the witnesses taken during the trial. Juror 3 was firm and determined that the boy was guilty. He had a powerful hate towards teens in general after having olden experiences with his own son. This makes him look past all the evidence built against the claim that he is guilty. For example, he refused to recall the doubt towards the testimony of the old soldiery.As per the testimony the old human being find outd the boy yell Im gonna kill you as well as acquired a body hit the fundament a split second later. After discussing in detail it comes into contemplation that there could have been no way for the old man to hear anything as the el train would have been roaring past his window. As described by Juror 8 one is unable to hear their own thoughts with the unbearable noise of the el train. This clearly brings the old mans testimony into doubt. Juror 3 is still persistent and wayward to believe the truth that is being set in front of him wholly because of his anger and hatred towards teens.See moreMark Twains Humorous Satire in Running for Governor EssayIn contrast, Juror 2 is new to the juror and hence very beaming and excited about the case. When he gets the opportunity to talk about the case, he is very open towards any argument that is being made. He bets logically of every piece of evidence that was not bought in court and makes his decisions regarding that. therefrom with a very unprejudiced happy mind his ability to think logically and reasonably about the case comes into practice. This is how different jurors come to different conclusions through their emotions in the movie 12 Angry Men.